Monday Meditation: More Extemp Questions
March 5, 2007 – 10:44 am by: Nick BubbBelow the break are the extemp questions used at last weekend’s Sandy Theobald Memorial Forensics Invitational at James Madison Memorial High School. During preliminary rounds extempers were given the choice to chose from a Domestic or Foreign envelope from which to draw their questions. During the final round, this was not the case. Enjoy.
Domestic Round 1: Policy Issues
1.) Should President Bush veto the minimum wage increase?
2.) Is Universal health care a possibility?
3.) Will the Democratic Congress destroy the Bush legacy?
4.) Can Congress do anything about the Iraq War?
5.) Can the United States reduce its dependence on foreign oil?
6.) Does ethanol provide an alternative energy solution?
7.) Are prescription drug prices too high?
8.) Will New Orleans ever recover from Hurricane Katrina?
9.) Can state centered approach be the United States’ solution to Global Warming?
Foreign Round 1: Middle East
1.) Will sanctions be effective in curtailing Iran’s nuclear program?
2.) Is Syria a threat to world security?
3.) Can increased U.S. troops in Iraq stabilize the country?
4.) Will the Indio-Pakistan peace talks be productive?
5.) Can Fatah and Hamas end their factional fighting?
6.) Will Britain’s withdrawal from Iraq affect the region?
7.) Is Pakistan cooperating with efforts to destroy the Taliban?
8.) Is Saudi Arabia a new force for peace in the region?
9.) Can the Afghan Opium trade be curtailed?
Domestic Round 2: National Politics
1.) Are David Geffen’s comments meaningful to the Democratic Primary?
2.) Who will be the Democratic Presidential Nominee in 2008?
3.) Who will be the Republican Presidential Nominee in 2008?
4.) What will be President Bush’s Legacy?
5.) What does the future hold for Al Gore?
6.) What does Tom Vilsack’s withdrawal say about the primary process?
7.) Can the Democrats retain control of Congress through 2008?
8.) What is Dennis Kucinich’s role in the Democratic Primary?
9.) What is Sam Brownback role in the Republican Primary?
Foreign Round 2: Europe
1.) Can the European Union lead the way on climate controls?
2.) Do Putin’s recent comments reflect a strained relationship with the United States?
3.) What does the future hold for Ramzan Kadyrov, the new President of Chechnya?
4.) Will the International Court of Justice’s recent Serbian ruling bring relief to Bosnia?
5.) How will troop withdrawal from Bosnia affect the region?
6.) Is Italy’s refusal to turn over C.I.A. operatives indicative of a marred U.S.-image?
7.) Can Italy’s Prodi overcome the no-confidence votes?
8.) What does the EU-Microsoft case say about international computing?
9.) Does the United States’ planned missile defense shield pose difficulties with Europe?
Domestic Round 3: Potpourri
1.) Can the Nation of Islam endure without Louis Farrakhan?
2.) Should the United States’ re-institute a military draft?
3.) Will the removed juror prevent the prosecution from reaching justice in the Scooter Libby trial?
4.) Is the American media fulfilling its role as the fourth branch of government?
5.) Will the Supreme Court Strike down the Military Commission Act of 2006?
6.) Will the Supreme Court overturn Racial-Desegregation orders?
7.) Will New Jeresy’s civil unions make the nation address gay marriage?
8.) Is a state-centered approach to health care the United States’ solution to health care?
9.) Is the United States prepared to deal with a large-scale natural disaster?
Foreign Round 3: Potpourri
1.) Are the crimes in Darfur acts of genocide?
2.) Will nationalization work in Bolivia?
3.) How successful was Stephen Harper’s first year in office?
4.) Can the Doha Round of trade negotiations be revived?
5.) Can the North Korean deal endure?
6.) Are China and the United States entering into a new space race?
7.) Should circumcision be considered a form of birth control for sub-Saharan African?
8.) Will Ban Ki Moon be an effective Secretary General?
9.) Can Senegal stabilize West Africa?
Final Round:
1.) George W. Bush – great President or greatest President?
2.) Should President Bush be held accountable for his pre-war lies?
3.) Should the United States go to war with Iran?
4.) Does Tony Blair’s withdrawal from Iraq create his legacy?
5.) Should the United States significantly crack down on illegal immigration?
6.) Has the federal government failed to give hope to the citizens of New Orleans?
7.) Does China have too much control over the American economy?
8.) Has the Bush Administration tarnished US-Russian relations?
9.) Are comedy news shows hurting American’s political discourse?
10.) Should the United States end the Cuban embargo?
11.) Should the United States expand stem cell research?
12.) Are Syria and Iran enemies or allies toward a long-term peace in Iraq?
6 Responses to “Monday Meditation: More Extemp Questions”
The first two questions in the final round (especially the first) seem just a little slanted…
By Tim on Mar 5, 2007
un poco.
By Jon on Mar 6, 2007
that was the idea
By Nick Bubb on Mar 6, 2007
I’ve been thinking about those 2 and if I think that the bias is good for education. I think it really can be. Being able to give a speech on a topic you might not personally agree with helps clarify your own views. But more importantly, extemp asks the student to present a logical and supported answer to the question. Each of those questions provides plenty of room to do that.
That all being said, I don’t think I’d like to judge a round of extemp where all of the questions were as biased as those 2.
By John K on Mar 7, 2007
Or, on the “bias” question, there is another option, one an impromptu student of mine was able to win a prelim round with once:
“This is a stupid question, and here’s why.”
In short, a “correct” answer to question 2 could be, “He didn’t lie.”
A “correct” answer to question 1 could be: He’s neither.
In short, simply because a question is written in a certain way doesn’t mean that the student has to accept the bias in the question. Major kudos to a student who can figure that out.
By Ed Falkner on Mar 7, 2007
Initially, I had a more elaborate explanation than my “that’s the point” post from above. Mr. Scheffler and I have been talking about having biased questioned in extemp for a long time.
We had two ideas in mind, first to force extempers not just to develop good analysis, but also good arguments. Sure, it’s easy to forecast the presidential candidates for 2008 - but the harder question to answer is why do we care. This may seem relatively obvious with my example, but for other questions extempers often times fail to answer the argument behind the question.
Second, we wanted extempers to be able to answer the hard questions. Attempting to defend a position you don’t agree with is one of the most educational aspects of debate, and we were attempting to apply that aspect with these extemp questions.
Mr. Falkner’s responses to both questions are entirely acceptable, and this is one of the things that I stressed in the draw room when I explained how the final round draw worked. My explanation went something like this: “There are 12 partisan questions, six are foreign issues, six are domestic. Six are liberally slanting, and six are conservatively slanting - but all questions can be answered from both sides.”
Additionally, we hoped that at least some student would realize that first question is a pop-culture reference to Stephen Colbert’s character on the Colbert report… In particular to the questions that he asks to Representatives during his 434 part series “Better Know a District.” We figured that alone would provide enough ammunition to make an entertaining speech, no matter how you decided to answer the question.
By Nick Bubb on Mar 7, 2007