<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Invitation To The 2007 Hilltopper Classic at MUHS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/</link>
	<description>Your Source for news and culture about Wisconsin Debate and Forensics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:05:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Knetzger</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1564</link>
		<dc:creator>John Knetzger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1564</guid>
		<description>Octo/octa....

From what I&#039;ve gleamed from some quick research, octa derives from Greek where octo derives from Greek and Latin.  Since we use Semi-final and not Hemi-final, I&#039;d go with the more Latin form and keep Octo.

Of course we could always call it the Sweet 16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Octo/octa&#8230;.</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve gleamed from some quick research, octa derives from Greek where octo derives from Greek and Latin.  Since we use Semi-final and not Hemi-final, I&#8217;d go with the more Latin form and keep Octo.</p>
<p>Of course we could always call it the Sweet 16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Knetzger</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1563</link>
		<dc:creator>John Knetzger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1563</guid>
		<description>Nick,

Are you talking about qualifying for the WSDT or what happens AT the WSDT?  It seems there would be a difference in qualifier at the octo(a) level and the elim rounds at state.

I applaud you for delving into the standing rules.  I&#039;ve tried to read them and it isn&#039;t easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick,</p>
<p>Are you talking about qualifying for the WSDT or what happens AT the WSDT?  It seems there would be a difference in qualifier at the octo(a) level and the elim rounds at state.</p>
<p>I applaud you for delving into the standing rules.  I&#8217;ve tried to read them and it isn&#8217;t easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bubb</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 01:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1562</guid>
		<description>here we go:

Fall of 2004:
&quot;Mike Traas moved that WDCA consider switching the number of VSS  STOC teams  from 32 to 35 as cut-off for going to octa-finals. Discussion of our two meetings rule for passing proposals led to a motion to suspend the rules. The suspension of the rules passed unanimously by a voice vote.&quot;

interestingly, this hasn&#039;t been updated in the standing rules.

The current version of the standing rules read:
&quot;32 entries and over - elimination rounds begin at octa-finals&quot;

(Which also isn&#039;t true, because we changed that at the spring meeting of 2007.  We changed it to read, “All teams with a winning record are eligible to compete in elimination rounds.  If the bracket is incomplete as a result, higher seed teams are advanced without debating in order to preserve the integrity of the competition.”  In other words, you need to have a 4-2 record to participate in elimination rounds and that partial elimination rounds can be used.)

These provisions technically related to the WSDT, but they can be assumed to reasonably apply to individual tournaments.  The reason for the absence of an octa(o)final is that we have not had many tournaments (aside from that one year in Wausau) that had more than 30 teams in the Varsity switch division.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here we go:</p>
<p>Fall of 2004:<br />
&#8220;Mike Traas moved that WDCA consider switching the number of VSS  STOC teams  from 32 to 35 as cut-off for going to octa-finals. Discussion of our two meetings rule for passing proposals led to a motion to suspend the rules. The suspension of the rules passed unanimously by a voice vote.&#8221;</p>
<p>interestingly, this hasn&#8217;t been updated in the standing rules.</p>
<p>The current version of the standing rules read:<br />
&#8220;32 entries and over &#8211; elimination rounds begin at octa-finals&#8221;</p>
<p>(Which also isn&#8217;t true, because we changed that at the spring meeting of 2007.  We changed it to read, “All teams with a winning record are eligible to compete in elimination rounds.  If the bracket is incomplete as a result, higher seed teams are advanced without debating in order to preserve the integrity of the competition.”  In other words, you need to have a 4-2 record to participate in elimination rounds and that partial elimination rounds can be used.)</p>
<p>These provisions technically related to the WSDT, but they can be assumed to reasonably apply to individual tournaments.  The reason for the absence of an octa(o)final is that we have not had many tournaments (aside from that one year in Wausau) that had more than 30 teams in the Varsity switch division.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Bubb</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Bubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2007 00:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>In the fall of 2001, the App East Challenge had like 40 teams in varsity.  Mike technically cleared to octofinals (btw; is it octo or octa - &#039;cause octa sounds like weak sauce), but then advanced all of the higher seeds.  So we the practice is set some where.

Let me do some reviewing of the standing rules (old bylaws).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the fall of 2001, the App East Challenge had like 40 teams in varsity.  Mike technically cleared to octofinals (btw; is it octo or octa &#8211; &#8217;cause octa sounds like weak sauce), but then advanced all of the higher seeds.  So we the practice is set some where.</p>
<p>Let me do some reviewing of the standing rules (old bylaws).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Knetzger</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>John Knetzger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 22:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>Bill,

In looking at the proposal we passed last weekend for JV and Novice divisions at switch side tournaments, it&#039;s at the quarterfinal level when there are 17 or more teams.

I&#039;m not sure what to think when almost half of the field earns a spot at the WSDT when there are 17 teams, but only 11% will earn the bid with the field this big.

My other question is what happens if/when a team from another state earns the bid to our state tournament.  Could they join the WDCA and come to the WDST?  Talk abou ironic, a team from somewhere else winning our state championship....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill,</p>
<p>In looking at the proposal we passed last weekend for JV and Novice divisions at switch side tournaments, it&#8217;s at the quarterfinal level when there are 17 or more teams.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure what to think when almost half of the field earns a spot at the WSDT when there are 17 teams, but only 11% will earn the bid with the field this big.</p>
<p>My other question is what happens if/when a team from another state earns the bid to our state tournament.  Could they join the WDCA and come to the WDST?  Talk abou ironic, a team from somewhere else winning our state championship&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Batterman</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1559</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Batterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2007 20:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1559</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m the President-Elect of the WDCA and don&#039;t know this, so excuse the irony: was there a provision added to enable tournaments in WI to become octafinals qualifiers for the State TOC (and now the WSDT)?  I thought there was, but can&#039;t find it.  We have 71 teams in VCX, so it seems reasonable that all teams that clear (to octafinals) should receive a bid to our state tournament, but the document I&#039;m looking at only goes up to quarterfinals.

Anyone?

Thanks,
~Bill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m the President-Elect of the WDCA and don&#8217;t know this, so excuse the irony: was there a provision added to enable tournaments in WI to become octafinals qualifiers for the State TOC (and now the WSDT)?  I thought there was, but can&#8217;t find it.  We have 71 teams in VCX, so it seems reasonable that all teams that clear (to octafinals) should receive a bid to our state tournament, but the document I&#8217;m looking at only goes up to quarterfinals.</p>
<p>Anyone?</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
~Bill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Scheffler</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Scheffler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 04:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Certainly a WSDT bid is possible.  Unfortunately, if a non-Wisconsin team clears, then it is one less bid for a Wisconsin team to move on.

Also, a proposal was raised at the spring WDCA meeting to allow 2-person teams in novice and JV pick up bids as a pair, provided they have a second team pick up a bid as well.  (Essentially, it would work the same as teams qualifying in 2 person and 4 person at the varsity level, but state would only offer the traditional 4 person divisions.)   That proposal is part of the old business to be addressed at the Fall meeting tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly a WSDT bid is possible.  Unfortunately, if a non-Wisconsin team clears, then it is one less bid for a Wisconsin team to move on.</p>
<p>Also, a proposal was raised at the spring WDCA meeting to allow 2-person teams in novice and JV pick up bids as a pair, provided they have a second team pick up a bid as well.  (Essentially, it would work the same as teams qualifying in 2 person and 4 person at the varsity level, but state would only offer the traditional 4 person divisions.)   That proposal is part of the old business to be addressed at the Fall meeting tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ Dworak</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1557</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ Dworak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 03:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1557</guid>
		<description>Obviously the finals bid is for the National TOC, but is there anyway to qualify for the WI state tournament at marquette or not?  Just wondering considering the majority are out of state teams, but previously marqutte was only instate so I wasn&#039;t sure.

Thanks for a response in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously the finals bid is for the National TOC, but is there anyway to qualify for the WI state tournament at marquette or not?  Just wondering considering the majority are out of state teams, but previously marqutte was only instate so I wasn&#8217;t sure.</p>
<p>Thanks for a response in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cory Puuri</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Cory Puuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 18:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>Can we register 8th graders in Novice even though they have competed in debate before?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can we register 8th graders in Novice even though they have competed in debate before?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Batterman</title>
		<link>http://www.wiforensics.com/2007/08/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Batterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 02:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wiforensics.com/2007/08/14/invitation-to-the-2007-hilltopper-classic-at-muhs/#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Updated team list:

http://www.cross-x.com/vb/showthread.php?p=1498445#post1498445</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Updated team list:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cross-x.com/vb/showthread.php?p=1498445#post1498445" rel="nofollow">http://www.cross-x.com/vb/showthread.php?p=1498445#post1498445</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
