Your Source for news and culture about Wisconsin Debate and Forensics
Paul Hager was recently asked how to be a good Second Negative. He started typing and didn’t stop. This is what came out… Read on as Paul tells all secrets about how to win on the negative with a core counterplan or Kritik as your route to victory.
The Duties of Good Second Negative by Paul Hager.
With several tournaments having the distinct possibility of moving and the schedule conflicts that have existed over the last season, Wisconsin Forensics Daily is interested in taking the lead in a discussion about the 2008 Debate Season Schedule in hopes of resolving any potential conflicts before they arise. In case some of you haven’t heard, the Appleton East Challenge potentially will not exist next season. We are also returning to a year where there are more weekends in September than we have had in the past. Hopefully with this work we can develop a 2008 schedule that works with Milwaukee Debate League, develops three large tournament before the state tournament, and avoids regionally conflicted tournaments. (And since that I’ve been reviewing the standing rules, I know that this was supposed to be resolved by today).
What follows below is a list of next year’s dates. I’ve listed the possibilities of tournaments on a particular date as well. I’ve tried to note what is going on with the National Circuit where appropriate:
Sept 12-13: Wake Forest, WDCA Fall Meeting
Sept 19-20: Marquette
Sept 26-27: Nicolet?, Valley?
Oct 3-4: Rufus King, Merrill?, New Trier
Oct 10-11: Hortonville, West Bend
Oct 17-18: LaCrosse, South Milwaukee?
Oct 24-25: Open,
Oct 31-Nov 1: Teachers Convention, Mukwonago?, Caucus/EGR?
Nov 7-8: (Sheboygan North if can’t move), Michigan
Nov 14-15: Janesville/Madison Memorial
Nov 21-22: Sheboygan South, Glenbrooks
Dec 5-6: Sheboygan North/Appleton East, Greendale/Hale
Dec 12-13: WDCA-WHSFA State, location TBA
If the first weekend of December is open (as in Appleton East is not hosting), then Sheboygan North would like to take that weekend and continue the tradition of running the challenge.
Tags: wdca
When I attended my first NFL National Tournament in 2001, I had the epiphany to become a teacher. I witnessed firsthand what forensics – and in a greater sense, education – could do for young people. After eleven years of coaching and a number of surreal successes, my greatest thrills still come from guiding students who work the hardest just to muster up enough strength to overcome a fear of speaking.
Read the rest of this entry »
When I attended my first NFL National Tournament in 2001, I had the epiphany to become a teacher. I witnessed firsthand what forensics – and in a greater sense, education – could do for young people. After eleven years of coaching and a number of surreal successes, my greatest thrills still come from guiding students who work the hardest just to muster up enough strength to overcome a fear of speaking.
We exist in a world rife with frustration over accountability and funding in our education system. This is a world where budget cuts eliminate programs, coach retirements give way to staffing cuts, or attrition finds few wishing to dedicate inexhaustible energy that has characterized legions of coaches before. As an urban public school educator, I have several speech and theatre classes that have ballooned to 38 students. That’s in addition to coaching extra-curricular forensics, directing plays and volunteering with school and professional committees. The NFL Council can be a voice of advocacy for our discipline and should leverage the wonderful partnerships we make to continue to communicate that objective. The NFL has a promising future of endowments and growth, but we must not lose sight of our existing constituency of coaches “in the trenches” and the students they serve.
I can bring fresh energy to the Council, coupled with a decade of experience coaching every event the NFL offers, while working within an Urban Debate League framework and juggling the challenges of fundraising and traveling. I have also worked in a public relations firm, as a legislative assistant, and as a board member of a local professional theatre company; therefore, I understand how nonprofits work, and how to network to get things done.
As I complete my three-year term as president of one of the several leagues in Wisconsin, I worked to build consensus despite a history of contentious differences. When we merged two state debate tournaments under one banner, the unity of an activity lagging in numbers contributed to growth in participation and pooling of resources. My purpose in any forensic leadership positions I have held in the past eight years is the same: maximizing opportunities for the most children as well as eroding egos of old to make way for cooperation anew. Most importantly I listen: to coaches and students.
Thank you for considering my candidacy,
Adam J. Jacobi - Rufus King HS - Milwaukee, WI
It has been a long, long time since we actually had a proper Thursday Thing to Read. (And even longer since it has been written by me). While many teams will be finishing up their preparation this week for the state tournament tomorrow, we at Wisconsin Forensics Daily want to encourage teams to take a step back from the impending high-stakes competition and to relax before the storm.
To facilitate that relaxation in a positive way, we are providing some State Tournament Trivia. There are no exclusions on who can participate in this trivia game. The rules are the same as last weekend. Send results through the WFD forum and I am the sole arbiter of points. Hopefully more teams will participate than last weekend. (If you were curious, no one participated last weekend, and so I didn’t even post the results).
One last reminder: Bring your laptops to the tournament! Or if you’re a parent, stay close to your computer and away from the snow! We will be providing live updates from South Milwaukee. (South Milwaukee has an open wireless network and has allowed WFD to post round-by-round updates in the previous years that the State Tournament has been held there.)
Wisconsin is losing one of its longest tenured coaches next season and one of the most active contributors to the state’s forensic community. After 32 years as the head coach of West Bend East High School’s debate and forensics programs and after providing countless hours of service to the broader community, Doris Sexton is hanging up her timers and textbooks and sailing off into retirement.
During awards ceremonies of forensic tournaments throughout the season, places in final rounds are often announced as being determined by judge’s preference. This announcement is usually followed by a series of boos or ooh or some other misunderstanding that attributes judge’s preference as something nefarious. In today’s Thursday Thing to Read I explain why Judges Preference is nothing to fear.
Today’s Thursday Thing comes from Michelle Tellock. Tellock formerly of Hortonville, is a current senior at The Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. She is the president of the school’s Woodrow Wilson Debate Council, which she will be representing at the World Universities Debating Championships in Vancouver later this month. In the following article, she discusses parliamentary debate – a form of interscholastic debate unique to the college level – and her involvement in college debate.
We’ve mentioned Parliamentary debate once before. There are now three active Parliamentary debate programs in Wisconsin: Marquette University, the University of Wisconsin - Oshkosh, and Carthage College. Joining them next semester will be the University of Wisconsin - Madison. Because of all of this, WFD felt that it would be best to have an article relating to parliamentary debate. And so we have Michelle’s article:
Parliamentary and Proud: The Value of “Other” Forms of Debate
WDCA Awards Nominations are due to Past-President Jessie Hager by November 15. This means that students interested in the WDCA Scholarship awards or coaches interested in nominating their colleagues should submit the required forms to Jessie by the date mentioned above.
And since we’ve been talking about WDCA History. Let’s take a look at the coaches and students that have won each of the respective awards since they have been established. What’s listed below is correct. The only thing we are missing are scholarships.
Next week, we return with our regularly scheduled Thursday Thing to Read with a piece by James Madison Memorial coach, Tim Scheffler, on why procedural arguments are good for debate. Tim has a unique perspective on this issue, because he is an attorney.
Scholarship forms can be found here: (LINK)
Coaching Nomination forms can be found here: (LINK)
Updated 10/30/06
Read the rest of this entry »
One of the main staples of modern policy debates are politics disadvantages. Many judges often see these arguments as unrelated, poorly researched arguments. Others love them. But what are politics disadvantages? How can debaters make them? And are they good for debate? Sheboygan North's recent graduate and current assistant coach, Jon Voss, takes on these issues in today's Thursday Thing to Read.
The Political Swamp: Washington’s impact on Policy Debate
Read the rest of this entry »